Managed Care Organization – nursing writers
April 23, 2022
Summarize the main principles of agency.
April 23, 2022

[ad_1]

1Unsatisfactory0.00%
2Less than Satisfactory74.00%
3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good97.00%
5Excellent100.00%

70.0 %Content

10.0 %Comparison Table: Table Compares Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method Articles
A comparison table is not included.
A comparison table is incomplete or incorrect.
A comparison table is included but lacks details.
A comparison is complete and includes sufficient detail.
A comparison is complete. The comparison is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Types of Study
A statement of the types of studies used in each article is not included.
A statement of the types of studies used in each article is incomplete or incorrect.
A statement of the types of studies used in each article is included but lacks detail.
A statement of the types of studies used in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.
A statement of the types of studies used in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Statistical Tests
A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is not included.
A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is incomplete or incorrect.
A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is included but lacks detail.
A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.
A discussion of the types of statistical tests and why they were chosen in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Parametric vs. Nonparametric Tests
A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is not included.
A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is incomplete or incorrect.
A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests and the types applied in the articles is included but lacks detail.
A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is complete and includes sufficient detail.
A discussion of the difference between parametric and nonparametric tests is clearly present. Discussion of the types applied in the articles is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Applicability of Statistical Tests
A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is not included.
A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is incomplete or incorrect.
A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is included but lacks detail.
A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is complete and includes sufficient detail.
A discussion of the applicability and justification of the chosen statistical test in each article is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Evaluation of Reliability and Validity Factors
An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is not included.
An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is incomplete or incorrect.
An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is included but lacks supporting details.
An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is complete and includes supporting details
An evaluation of the reliability and validity factors and how they are accounted for in the articles is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.

10.0 %Summary
A summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is not included.
A summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is incomplete or incorrect.
A summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is included but lacks supporting details.
A summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is complete and includes supporting details
A summary of how the chosen studies could be applied in practice is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

[ad_2]

Source link

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service
ORDER NOW