and-freedom-writing-homework-help – Nursing Writers Hub
April 12, 2022
explain how popular culture has quot no fixed forms quot
April 12, 2022


Research Report – Qualitative Research // Basic Critique Form
Format (10%)
Title page, APA format with CUC date and instructor addition
Neatly typewritten
Correct spelling and grammar
Correct sentence structure
Evidence of logical topic development
APA citations, headings, margins, spacing, font
Length – 3 pages, not including references
Content (90%)
Summary of article. [ 10%]
Examine the organization and presentation of the report
Remember, this is a critique of the research article, and the summary is a critique summary, not a summation of the author’s work.
Complete, concise, clearly presented, and logically organizedDoes not include excessive jargon that is difficult for students and practicing nurses to readReferences are complete, current and consistent in formatAuthors have the educational and clinical credentials to conduct the study
Identification of report elements. [ 25% ]
Evaluate objectively, then explain how these elements from the chosen study meet (or do not meet) the expected definition and purpose of each element
Descriptive VividnessDocumentation of ParticipantsMethodological CongruenceEthical StandardsAuditabilityAnalytical and Interpretive PrecisenessPhilosophical / Theoretical ConnectednessHeuristic RelevanceIntuitive RecognitionRelationship to existing Body of KnowledgeStrengths and weaknesses of article. [ 35% ]
In this comparison and analysis phase of the critique:
Consider how the research elements relate to one another, particularly in reference to the stated research design. Here is a suggestion list of elements to consider. Reference your Research text also, as this is not an exhaustive list.
is the research objective format at a comparable level to the stated designdo the operational tools measure the conceptis the sampling method and plan style appropriate for the chosen research designhas the author related the theoretical framework to concept variables, and outcomesis the problem heuristic to nursing, does the theoretical basis related to nursing concernsare limitations (both types) and biases addressed – can you identify possible concerns to generalizabilityvalidity and reliability of instruments / data : of outcomes due to uncontrolled threatsdoes the author support the study rigor expected for the stated designare study variables – demographics, setting – controlled sufficiently for chosen research designSpecify examplesJustify your criticisms of these examplesSuggest research method alternativesImplications. [ 20% ]
Explore implications of the study for –
Professional clinical practiceFurther research (higher level, replication for changes in elements)
Use the following grid to guide your reading and analysis of the 8 points above:
STANDARDS/EVALUATION CRITERIADescriptive VividnessWas the significance of the study adequately described?Was the purpose of the study clearly described?Were the interpretations presented in a descriptive way that illuminated more than the quotes did?Documentation of ParticipantsWere the study participants described in detail?Was the selection of participants reasonable? Was a rationale provided for participant selection?3. Were the context and location of the study described with sufficient detail to determine if the findings are applicable to other settings?
Methodological CongruenceWere the assumptions underlying the study articulated? Were the assumptions and data collection procedures congruent?Was adequate trust established with the participants? Was there an open dialog and conversational approach to data collection?Were research questions articulated? Did the researcher ask questions that explore participants’ experiences, beliefs, values, or perceptions?Was the data collection process adequately described?Did the researcher spend sufficient time with participants gathering data? Did the researcher conduct multiple interviews?Was the approach of multiple data collectors similar?Was the method of selecting and gaining access to the study participants reasonable?Was the role of the researcher during the interview process described? Were qualitative credentials and expertise of the researcher(s) described?
Ethical StandardsWere the participants informed of their rights?Was informed consent obtained?Were participants’ rights protected?
AuditabilityWas the decision trail used in arriving at conclusions described in adequate detail? Can the findings be linked with the data?Were enough participant quotes included to support the findings?3. Were the data sufficiently rich to support the conclusions? Did the participants describe specific examples of the phenomenon being investigated?
Analytical and Interpretative PrecisenessDo the categories, themes, or findings present a whole picture? Did the findings yield a meaningful picture of the phenomenon under study?Were the findings returned to participants or experts in the area?Did two or more researchers participate in data analysis? How were disagreements about data analysis handled?
Philosophical/Theoretical ConnectednessWas a clear connection made between the data and nursing practice?Did the researcher identify the philosophical or theoretical basis for the study? Were citations provided for the philosophical or theoretical approach used?Was the philosophical or theoretical basis of the study consistent with the study assumptions, data collection process, and analysis and interpretative methods used? Were citations provided for the philosophical or theoretical approach used?
Heuristic Relevance:Intuitive Recognition
Can the reader recognize the phenomenon described in the study?2. Are the findings consistent with common meanings or experiences?
Relationship to Existing Body of KnowledgeDid the researcher adequately examine the existing body of knowledge?Did the researcher compare and contrast the findings with those of other studies?Did the researcher describe lacunae in current understandings that would account for unique findings?Threats to Nursing a) Practice, b) Research, or c) EducationAre the findings relevant to nursing practice, research, or education?Did the reader learn more than had been previously reported in the literature?Do the findings have implications for related cases?Are suggestions for further study identified?

. .

The post Evidence of logical topic development appeared first on nursing term paper.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.



Source link


"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service